Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 14:24:30 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Chris Readle <patterner@rocketmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make optimizations Message-ID: <20031017212430.GB5764@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20031017181908.42948.qmail@web40610.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20031017181908.42948.qmail@web40610.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--St7VIuEGZ6dlpu13 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 11:19:08AM -0700, Chris Readle wrote: > Since I'm going to be cvsuping (is that even a word?) up to RELENG_4 from > RELENG_4_8 this weekend, I was wanting to see what the general concensus > on /etc/make.conf optimizations is, particularly CPUTYPE. I'm running on > an Athlon processor and I currently have CPUTYPE =3D k7 in my > /etc/make.conf. >=20 > Is this generally considered a good thing, bad thing or an indifferent > thing? Good thing, as long as it works. For example, some versions of gcc have bugs in CPU-specific optimizations that are enabled by setting CPUTYPE. CPUTYPE is generally considered safe, though. > Also, are there other optimizations that I might want to consider? Not that are recommended. Kris --St7VIuEGZ6dlpu13 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/kF4OWry0BWjoQKURArRnAKCCpTTMqwg5iZIV3fV0lJFNdzCL5QCfUb6q +hLCpN6FPJBrhvf2CXvm7oY= =rvPa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --St7VIuEGZ6dlpu13--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031017212430.GB5764>