Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 11:44:23 +1000 From: Stephen McKay <syssgm@dtir.qld.gov.au> To: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org, syssgm@dtir.qld.gov.au Subject: Re: At Large Message-ID: <199709110144.LAA04491@troll.dtir.qld.gov.au> In-Reply-To: <199709101528.JAA29362@rocky.mt.sri.com> from Nate Williams at "Wed, 10 Sep 1997 09:28:09 -0600" References: <199709090409.VAA13111@implode.root.com> <199709100735.RAA19463@ogre.dtir.qld.gov.au> <199709101528.JAA29362@rocky.mt.sri.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday, 10th September 1997, Nate Williams wrote: >>> 2) There's only one mycroft at MIT that I know about, and he was never part >>> of the FreeBSD "board" or development. >> >> But he was a patchkit contributor. > >No he wasn't. I based this assertion on /usr/share/doc/handbook/handbook.ascii on my 2.2.2 box (line 23291 if you care). If I can actually find a copy of the patchkit we'll see where the real misinformation is coming from. :-) And David Greenman wrote: >386BSD didn't exist until early '92, so including 1991 in this is still wrong. Hrm. I was sure I'd read about 386BSD in Dr Dobbs in 1991, though it might have been called BSD386 at the time. Again, if I dig down through the strata of my magazine archive, I'll be able to prove or disprove this too. Stephen.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199709110144.LAA04491>