Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 08:01:21 -0700 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Garrett Cooper <youshi10@u.washington.edu> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Don Lewis <truckman@freebsd.org>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /usr/share/mk/sys.mk and FORTRAN on -CURRENT Message-ID: <20070604150121.GA18864@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <4663D1C1.2020705@u.washington.edu> References: <200706032347.l53NlXU6055249@gw.catspoiler.org> <20070604010942.GA13434@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <4663D1C1.2020705@u.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 01:48:01AM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> Steve Kargl wrote:
> >On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 04:47:33PM -0700, Don Lewis wrote:
> >
> >>I was taking a look at why math/lapack fails to build on -CURRENT and
> >>discovered that the port uses ${FC} to find the FORTRAN compiler. I
> >>then discovered that /usr/share/mk/sys.mk defines ${FC} as f77 (or
> >>fort77). I don't this is appropriate since f77 has been removed from
> >>-CURRENT.
> >>
> >>I don't know what the proper fix is, but I though I should point out the
> >>problem ...
> >>
> >>
> >
> >There are two bugs here. 1) FC should be removed. 2) The
> >various ports that use Fortran should use gfortran42
> >installed with lang/gcc42.
> >
> >
> Not only that. f77 in gcc-4.2 has some bugs that are waiting to be
> worked out in 4.2.1, so that may be a part of the issue as well.
There isn't an 'f77' in gcc-4.2. There is gfortran, which is a
Fortran 95 comiler with several Fortran 2003 extension. There
are only a few bugs (ie 2 or 3) in corner cases that affect the
ability to compile code which conforms to the Fortran 77 standard.
--
Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070604150121.GA18864>