Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 19:26:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: "Campbell, Glenn" <CampbellG@mar.dfo-mpo.gc.ca>, smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Intel SE7500CW2 Mainboard SMP Problems Message-ID: <15742.32707.183751.698741@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> In-Reply-To: <3D7E6ACD.D066E865@mindspring.com> References: <93FC2E7CA4507340BD77D154DD11B8AA253863@MARSYDE01> <15742.16259.883414.449683@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <3D7E6ACD.D066E865@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Terry Lambert writes: > > Is it possible our AP spinup code has never been tried with CPUs at > > anything other than the next physical id (eg, 1)? > > This was not the case historically. AP on 6 was the standard > for the boards PHK and Jack Vogel had. I know that there was > code to rewrite the APIC ID to linearize them, at one time. > > Is it now being assumed that it's linear? The ID is basically Not that I know -- it was just a WAG. All the x86 mp boards I've seen have had the first AP at #1, so I was assuming there might be a problem. Drew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15742.32707.183751.698741>