Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 18:46:45 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> To: Francisco Reyes <lists@stringsutils.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Are hardware vendors starting to bail on FreeBSD ... ? Message-ID: <20060628184537.R1114@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <cone.1151529649.495508.61382.1000@zoraida.natserv.net> References: <20060622174220.AEB6D44696@mx1.FreeBSD.org> <20060622145130.I1114@ganymede.hub.org> <cone.1151484180.608204.14057.5001@35st-server.simplicato.com> <20060628131353.R1114@ganymede.hub.org> <cone.1151529649.495508.61382.1000@zoraida.natserv.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Francisco Reyes wrote: > Marc G. Fournier writes: > >> the problem is that none of the Tier 1 hardware manufacturer's support >> FreeBSD, and a growing number of places (ie. Adaptec / Intel) appear to be >> dropping support for it as well ... > > But companies like 3Ware and Areca are supporting it and from what I see on > the lists, people are voting with their money in their favor. The problem is that 3Ware and Areca, I believe, are SATA vendors ... what I'm trying to do is keep to one 'integrated environment / vendor', and stick with SCSI ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060628184537.R1114>