Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 23:59:08 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Ernst de Haan <ernst.dehaan@nl.wanadoo.com> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: Openoffice-1.1 depends on 5 different jdks Message-ID: <20040325075908.GA63991@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <200403250856.33861.ernst.dehaan@nl.wanadoo.com> References: <20040324194155.GA53330@xor.obsecurity.org> <200403250820.15128.ernst.dehaan@nl.wanadoo.com> <20040325074351.GA63609@xor.obsecurity.org> <200403250856.33861.ernst.dehaan@nl.wanadoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 08:56:33AM +0100, Ernst de Haan wrote: > On Thursday 25 March 2004 08:43, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 08:20:15AM +0100, Ernst de Haan wrote: > > > Kris, > > > > > > > This does hilight the bsd.java.mk problem that old versions of the > > > > jdk are used by default by the USE_JAVA=3D1.2+ construction, which > > > > defaults to the oldest possible jdk (1.2) instead of the newest > > > > stable version. > > > > > > When newer JDK's become more stable than the old ones _and_ have not > > > too many dependencies, then the newer JDK's are moved up the preferen= ce > > > list. > > > > Isn't at least 1.3 considered "stable"? 1.2 is unbuildable as a > > package because it eventually depends on the FORBIDDEN compat3x. >=20 > Indeed we could use 1.3. I just checked the bsd.java.mk source and if=20 > USE_JAVA is set to 1.1+ and no JDK is installed, then it will use 1.1. >=20 > But I suggest we hold off changing this now, because we're in the process= of=20 > a new bsd.java.mk 2.0, by Herve Quiroz. If there are any changes we need = to=20 > make to the process, they should be made to the new version. OK, I'll probably just change it locally to see how far the openoffice package build gets before it blows up. Kris --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAYpFMWry0BWjoQKURApAMAKCbtWusAemY7dnd/6U/bluiuELBrgCgxd7X UYi9kJxsInczGAWhvQQeTPM= =1rnV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040325075908.GA63991>