Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 12 Aug 2001 09:15:48 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>
To:        Michael Robinson <robinson@netrinsics.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: _sigprocmask in malloc.c causes full file table?
Message-ID:  <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010812091456.19516A-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010812090502.18424A-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 12 Aug 2001, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Aug 2001, Michael Robinson wrote:
> > Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> wrote:
> > >Malloc is not re-entrant...i.e.
> > >you cannot use in in a signal handler..
> > 
> > Thank you for that very helpful bit of information, but I already knew that.
> > 
> > What I do not know is how it is possible for a null _sigprocmask call
> > (a SIG_BLOCK call with no mask bits set) in libc/stdlib/malloc.c to cause a
> 
> Sorry, I missed this the first time...  Where is there a _sigprocmask()
> call in libc/stdlib/malloc.c?  I don't find one.

Ignore this.  I found the first posting.

-- 
Dan Eischen

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SUN.3.91.1010812091456.19516A-100000>