Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 18 Oct 2005 11:05:09 +0200
From:      Francois Tigeot <ftigeot@wolfpond.org>
To:        Brett Glass <brett@lariat.net>
Cc:        stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: 6.0 release date and stability
Message-ID:  <20051018090509.GA40064@aoi.wolfpond.org>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20051017195314.080f90f8@lariat.org>
References:  <200510152346.RAA20742@lariat.net> <6.2.3.4.0.20051017202509.0869bc58@64.7.153.2> <6.2.5.6.2.20051017195314.080f90f8@lariat.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 07:56:34PM -0600, Brett Glass wrote:
> At 06:38 PM 10/17/2005, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>  
> >Two of our scanners in the cluster are SMP boxes-- dual core AMD running in 386 mode and an Intel D830.
> >Both work really well, and take quite a load against them network / cpu wise.  Lots of threads running. 
> >Also have FAST_IPSEC clients and a server running RELENG_6 from around Beta 1.
> 
> How is AMD in AMD64 mode? One thing we're looking at doing is deploying some single-core AMD64s.

Very stable since -BETA4 on a single core machine here (workstation and
X11 terminal server). It had crashes under load with previous -BETA.
Uptime went to 20+ days without trouble before I upgraded it to -RC1.

The hardware is a MSI board with VIA chipset.

-- 
Francois Tigeot



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051018090509.GA40064>