Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 22:46:23 +0300 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: For all who miss it, PAM changes explanation reposted Message-ID: <20020119194623.GA13476@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <200201191924.g0JJOgt23714@grimreaper.grondar.org> References: <20020119190636.GE12683@nagual.pp.ru> <200201191924.g0JJOgt23714@grimreaper.grondar.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 19:24:42 +0000, Mark Murray wrote: > > This means that "stuff" needed to authenticate the user is insufficient. > (For example, in a two-password scenario where only one password has > been supplied). If you can use that meaning, then fine! (Note that > "insufficient" != "wrong"). From some point of view it is true, i.e. pam_opie decides by itself that all following auth will be insufficient and breaks out of the chain. > cannot. This may be a problem in its own right, in which case PAM > (core PAM) needs to be fixed. If _that_ is the case, this this needs > to be carefully thought out and co-ordinated through DES and myself. Maybe yes, probably PAM core needs to be fixed to provide more descriptive error code. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020119194623.GA13476>