Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 26 Mar 2013 23:35:14 +0300
From:      David Naylor <dbn@freebsd.org>
To:        "Sergey A. Osokin" <osa@freebsd.org>
Cc:        svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, Martin Wilke <miwi@bsdhash.org>, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r315245 - in head/emulators: . i386-wine-devel i386-wine-devel/files
Message-ID:  <36875999.qo3ESN1v78@dragon.dg>
In-Reply-To: <20130326025707.GG39887@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <201303252008.r2PK8jtt049848@svn.freebsd.org> <552F406F-8274-4FBC-B36A-65C99542E8BF@bsdhash.org> <20130326025707.GG39887@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--nextPart2646172.5KebPudHXO
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r"

On Tuesday, 26 March 2013 02:57:07 Sergey A. Osokin wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 08:13:03AM +0800, Martin Wilke wrote:
> > Why it calls i386-wine-devel? is wine-devel not just enough?
> 
> I'm not sure that its possible to run i386 windows binaries on
> amd64 with standard wine-devel port.

The wine situation appears to be rather complicated.  One can get:
 * wine for 32bit (emulators/wine and emulators/wine-devel) that runs on 
FreeBSD/i386, compiles on FreeBSD/i386
 * wine for 32bit (emulators/i386-wine-devel) that runs on FreeBSD/amd64, 
compiles on FreeBSD/i386
 * wine for 64bit (not ported) that runs on FreeBSD/amd64, will compile on 
FreeBSD/amd64
 * WoW64, wine for 32bit and 64bit (not ported) that runs on FreeBSD/amd64, 
this port (if and when ported) will supersede emulators/i386-wine-devel.  Will 
compile on FreeBSD/amd64 [1]

As for the particular naming, of i386, I followed the linux- convention where 
the prefix indicates a different architecture (but can still be installed).  

I have plans (very early plans) to allow i386 to be installed on FreeBSD/amd64 
by downloading the package (although no compilation on FreeBSD/amd64) and 
possibly integrating this port into the main port, but one step (port) at a 
time.  

[1] I think, wine might (probably) will require a compiler than can produce 
(cross-compile) 32bit binaries, which excludes base gcc.  

Regards
--nextPart2646172.5KebPudHXO
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)

iEYEABECAAYFAlFSFJUACgkQUaaFgP9pFrItfACfVzsPskKM51VDyRzmmI8Gazzo
6qQAnijeaT68nfwXWAAxt8fAxYhn5nMm
=3t23
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart2646172.5KebPudHXO--




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?36875999.qo3ESN1v78>