Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 12:50:41 +0100 From: RW <fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: amd64 FreeBSD Release 5.5 -> 6.2 Message-ID: <20070519125041.54e7da47@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <20070518132807.Q17258@duane.dbq.yournetplus.com> References: <20070516182846.C34584@duane.dbq.yournetplus.com> <464BCE1A.4020400@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20070517102831.O61920@duane.dbq.yournetplus.com> <20070518141045.490c80be@gumby.homeunix.com.> <20070518132807.Q17258@duane.dbq.yournetplus.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 18 May 2007 13:31:52 +0000 (UTC) Duane Hill <d.hill@yournetplus.com> wrote: > On Fri, 18 May 2007, RW wrote: > > > On Thu, 17 May 2007 10:39:35 +0000 (UTC) > > Duane Hill <d.hill@yournetplus.com> wrote: > > > >> On Thu, 17 May 2007, Matthew Seaman wrote: > >> > > > >>> You should be able to upgrade the system by a routine buildworld, > >>> buildkernel ... type operation, but beware that you will need to > >>> recompile all of your ports because of potential shlib version > >>> clashes. Ports from 5.5 will still work on 6.2, but later trying > >>> to update them piecemeal can lead to misery. > >> > >> I'm using portupgrade. So I will use the switches force a reinstall > >> and to act on everything that depends on the reinstalled port > >> (-fr). > >> > > > > > > That wont do anything useful as there is nothing for the -r to work > > with after a base-system upgrade. > > > > The best way to upgrade all ports with portupgrade is to do it by > > datestamp like this: > > > > portupgrade -f '<2007-05-18 14:00' > > What about: > > portupgrade -afR > > Wouldn't that force everything including ports that depend on the one > being reinstalled? If you use the datestamp instead of -a, you can stop and start the build.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070519125041.54e7da47>