Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 9 Jul 2004 14:44:16 -0300 (ADT)
From:      "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
To:        Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Native preemption is the culprit [was Re: today's CURRENT lockups]
Message-ID:  <20040709144251.X728@ganymede.hub.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040709172511.GA10540@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
References:  <20040705184940.GA2651@tybalt.greiner.local> <200407081317.53981.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <200407091315.16899.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20040709172511.GA10540@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Steve Kargl wrote:

> I've tested it on a UP kernel (HTT enabled, ACPI disabled,
> APIC enabled, ULE).   Appears to work fine.

'k, I just upgraded my machine to latest, running ULE, P4, SMP kernel (but 
doesn't find or start up a second CPU) ... just locked solid here too ... 
unfortunately, was running X at the time, so don't know if it locked or 
panic'd to DDB :(  Running non-X right now to see if it happens again ...

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040709144251.X728>