Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 14:07:22 +0100 (CET) From: Søren Schmidt <sos@freebsd.dk> To: Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl> Cc: Matthew Gilbert <agilbertm@earthlink.net>, Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.4-STABLE crashes - suspects new ata-driver over wd-drivers Message-ID: <200112271307.fBRD7Ma47234@freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <20011227140303.C17992@freebie.xs4all.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It seems Wilko Bulte wrote: > On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 12:15:56AM +0100, Søren Schmidt wrote: > > It seems Matthew Gilbert wrote: > > > > So, general question to everyone having crashes during heavy > > > > IDE workloads: Please post your /var/run/dmesg.boot > > > > output. > > > > > atapci0: <VIA 82C686 ATA100 controller> port 0xd000-0xd00f at device 7.1 on > > > > You have the VIA 82c686b southbridge chip which is known to cause severe > > Hi Soren, > > isn't it possible to identify the southbridge as a B variant directly? > > What I mean is, I have an older (non-B) > > isab0: <VIA 82C686 PCI-ISA bridge> at device 4.0 on pci0 > atapci0: <VIA 82C686 ATA66 controller> port 0xd800-0xd80f at device 4.1 on > pci0 > pci0 > > and the strings that is displayed is almost the same (ATA100 versus > ATA66). > > Identifying it a bit more clearly might save a bunch of questions on > the lists. Well I think the ATA66 versus ATA100 is plenty different to tell which version we've dealing with here, and there's already new chipsets from VIA that uses the same ID's but with different chip names, so the chip number is more or less without meaning anyways.... -Søren To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200112271307.fBRD7Ma47234>