Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 15:02:09 -0400 From: Gary Palmer <gpalmer@freebsd.org> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: archivers/rpm build problem Message-ID: <20140702190209.GA36735@in-addr.com> In-Reply-To: <20140702062550.GI7307@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20140701123008.GA77747@in-addr.com> <20140702062550.GI7307@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 08:25:50AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 08:30:08AM -0400, Gary Palmer wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've had a problem with archivers/rpm since the last update. It refuses > > to build saying > > > > ===> Building for rpm-3.0.6_17 > > cd . && aclocal > > aclocal: macro `_LT_DECL_SED' required but not defined > > aclocal: macro `_LT_FUNC_STRIPNAME_CNF' required but not defined > > aclocal: macro `gl_ICONV_H_DEFAULTS' required but not defined > > gmake: *** [aclocal.m4] Error 1 > > ===> Compilation failed unexpectedly. > > > > I've included a build log below. Any ideas? > > > > Please keep me on CC as I do not believe I am subscribed to freebsd-ports > > > > Thanks, > > > > Gary > > > > I can confirm the problem and will see if I can fix, I was wondering why do you > or other people use rpm for? I am planning to remove archivers/rpm and > recommanding using archivers/rpm4 instead, so I need to need any corner case > where rpm4 cannot do rpm3 job. > > btw the linux ports now directly use plain bsdtar :) Hi Baptiste, Actually, the only port I have installed that marked archivers/rpm as a runtime requirement is x11-wm/wmakerconf, which I see now uses archivers/rpm4 so I may not need archivers/rpm any more. Not 100% sure to be honest since only runtime dependancies are recorded in /var/db/pkg. Thanks, Gary
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140702190209.GA36735>