Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 12 Sep 1997 14:34:14 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Stefan Molnar <stefan@exis.net>
To:        Richard Hodges <rh@alpine.net>
Cc:        lashby@texramp.net, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: NAT for dialups?
Message-ID:  <Pine.LNX.3.95.970912143204.17581D-100000@sailfish.exis.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970912101757.28083E-100000@oak.alpine.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

> I did a quick test with ether/ether on a 486/100 with 2.2.2  It
> worked surprisingly well.  I tested web, ftp, irc, news, realaudio,
> and MS file & print services.  FTP pooped out around 400K/second,
> about half what it should be (CPU utilization: around 30%), but
> normal web browsing seemed as good (or better!) than before.

Also someone might need to checkout gaming, via Kahn, and Kali.  
Too bad that I do not have enough time for gaming to test 
natd ether/ether.

Stefan





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.3.95.970912143204.17581D-100000>