Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 24 Nov 1999 10:46:40 -0700
From:      Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
To:        Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
Cc:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: ps on 4.0-current 
Message-ID:  <199911241746.KAA21366@harmony.village.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 24 Nov 1999 18:29:30 %2B0100." <35709.943464570@critter.freebsd.dk> 
References:  <35709.943464570@critter.freebsd.dk>  

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <35709.943464570@critter.freebsd.dk> Poul-Henning Kamp writes:
: So please explain the logic you want implemented once people have
: stopped haggeling about it, it is rather trivial.

OK.  I'll likely state what I'd like to see as a patch.

: I pressume we want the same policy for /proc/*/cmdline as for the
: sysctl ps(1) uses ?

Yes.  I'll firm this up later today and send an exact proposal out so
we can kill this.

Warner


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199911241746.KAA21366>