Date: Sun, 28 Nov 1999 21:38:40 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@NUXI.com> To: Will Andrews <andrews@TECHNOLOGIST.COM> Cc: "David O'Brien" <obrien@nuxi.com>, "Chris D. Faulhaber" <jedgar@fxp.org>, Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, Ade Lovett <ade@lovett.com> Subject: Re: ports/15135: new port: devel/cervisia Message-ID: <19991128213840.J1371@relay.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.991129003105.andrews@TECHNOLOGIST.COM> References: <19991128210537.A54056@dragon.nuxi.com> <XFMail.991129003105.andrews@TECHNOLOGIST.COM>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Nov 29, 1999 at 12:31:05AM -0500, Will Andrews wrote: > Right. The problem here is that the KDE and Qt port maintainers seem reluctant > to put the switch in the kdelibs11 and qt142 ports so that those ports will be > compiled using the newer g++.. required for certain aforementioned apps. > > I think the sooner, the better. Oh well if people have to recompile their > libraries with NEWGCC, right? :-) I agree. > The reason I asked about MFC'ing egcs 1.1.2 is because it would eliminate the > need to have USE_NEWGCC in the ports system. Yes. But of course that would require everyone to recompile their libs as much as useing NEWGCC would. :) -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.com) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991128213840.J1371>