Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 11:13:42 +0900 From: JINMEI Tatuya / =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCP0BMQEMjOkgbKEI=?= <jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp> To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IPsec support in FreeBSD. Message-ID: <14309.38998.969576.82635W@condor.isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp> In-Reply-To: In your message of "Sun, 19 Sep 1999 15:44:22 %2B1000 (EST)" <XFMail.990919154422.chris@twilight.tpgi.com.au> References: <XFMail.990919154422.chris@twilight.tpgi.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> On Sun, 19 Sep 1999 15:44:22 +1000 (EST), >>>>> Chris Keladis <chris@twilight.tpgi.com.au> said: > Hi all, > Was wondering what IPSec implementations are available for 3.[23]-STABLE ? > I noticed KAME, but from what i read i didnt see anything about IPv4 support. If you worry about whether KAME supports IPv4 IPsec, no problem. KAME of course supports IPv4 IPsec as well. We admit that we don't provide enough document for KAME IPsec on the web page(i.e. http://www.kame.net/). If you have any questions or problems about KAME IPsec, please ask your questions on snap-users@kame.net. JINMEI, Tatuya Communication Platform Lab. Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp. jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?14309.38998.969576.82635W>