Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 22:43:01 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: deischen@freebsd.org Cc: h@schmalzbauer.de Subject: Re: ports and -current Message-ID: <20030921054301.GA40864@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10309210041350.26520-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> References: <20030920175306.Q9576@znfgre.qbhto.arg> <Pine.GSO.4.10.10309210041350.26520-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 12:46:30AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > This is the longest ports freeze that I can remember I can only suppose that you haven't been paying attention to other release cycles, because this one is shorter than usual. > I wasn't > expecting it to last long. Not to change the subject, I thought > it would just be long enough to lay the tag. I don't think you > should label it as bad timing as much as asking why the freeze is > taking so long. The release schedule has been on the website for over a month, so again it looks like you were simply uniformed as to timing and duration of the release events. Daniel, I'm trying to be reasonable here, and I think my previous proposal achieves the ends we all want with a minimum of disruption to the various parties involved. Unfortunately I'm seeing a lot of heat from you and not a lot of discussion. Can we please try and work cooperatively? Kris --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/bTpkWry0BWjoQKURAin/AJ9DPpg9BOsvFlmYA5D7ATWuMKxyoQCg6fat b6w9u2bo2INs6jwaC+1HJ9M= =r+Ff -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030921054301.GA40864>