Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2008 01:04:09 -0400 From: Ken Smith <kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pax in /rescue Message-ID: <1220763849.29265.47.camel@bauer.cse.buffalo.edu> In-Reply-To: <20080906.224018.-1303464793.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <20080906.224018.-1303464793.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-tn97nH2oNT/qzNWtCCLS
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, 2008-09-06 at 22:40 -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> Is there any reason to continue to include both tar and pax in
> /rescue?
JFYI - despite the cpio/sysinstall issues apparently being fixed I'm
still planning to switch sysinstall over to using tar. I know that's
not what you're "directly" asking about but it's at least "remotely
related" depending on peoples' feelings about which of the two should be
removed if the answer to your question is "No".
--=20
Ken Smith
- From there to here, from here to | kensmith@cse.buffalo.edu
there, funny things are everywhere. |
- Theodore Geisel |
--=-tn97nH2oNT/qzNWtCCLS
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD)
iEYEABECAAYFAkjDYMkACgkQ/G14VSmup/aHtgCbBgdz+s+IZ3MiO+0FJp8mHsu4
iyEAoIwXTjL0LqzkxsJZBq+guyTO+3CP
=nCVp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-tn97nH2oNT/qzNWtCCLS--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1220763849.29265.47.camel>