Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 16:03:27 +0200 From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern vfs_subr.c Message-ID: <xzpu0smx32o.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <200410211348.i9LDmomG044745@repoman.freebsd.org> (Poul-Henning Kamp's message of "Thu, 21 Oct 2004 13:48:50 %2B0000 (UTC)") References: <200410211348.i9LDmomG044745@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> writes: > Log: > Simplify buf_vlist_remove(). >=20=20=20 > Now that we have encapsulated the splaytree related information > into a structure we can eliminate the half of this function. Is there any particular reason why you are using a home-grown splay tree implementation instead of <sys/tree.h>? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpu0smx32o.fsf>