Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 06:20:28 GMT From: Michael Ranner <mranner@inode.at> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/71069: [MAINTAINER] mail/spamass-rules: update to 20040828 Message-ID: <200409020620.i826KSHH019641@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/71069; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Michael Ranner <mranner@inode.at>
To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, mranner@inode.at
Cc: Yen-Ming Lee <leeym@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: ports/71069: [MAINTAINER] mail/spamass-rules: update to 20040828
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 08:15:01 +0200
We have discussed it with mat, pav and eik out of gnats. Last comment from eik
was:
To return to your example: Both approaches are correct. You can try to
remove the directories, which will cause no harm since they are
non-empty by default, or just decide to leave them there, since they
are `owned' by another port. There is more than one way to do things,
and that is one reason for having port maintainers: some decisions can't
be made mechanically. Personally I would decide not to remove the
directories (since they are `owned' by mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin), but
it will cause no harm doing so (and supporting the `mtree-test').
Especially since the directories are non-empty when SpamAssassin is
installed, so it's basically a no-op.
If we like some democratic result, it stands 3 (rm pkg-plist) : 1 (keep it)
so please commit ports/71069 and close the other.
--
/\/\ichael Ranner
mranner@inode.at - mranner@jawa.at - mranner@bugat.at
-----------------------------------------------------
BSD Usergroup Austria - http://www.bugat.at/
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
GIT/CS/AT dx(-) s+:(++:) a- C++ UBLVS++++$ P++>+++$ L-(+)$ E---
W+++$ N+(++) o-- K- w--()$ O-(--) M@ V-(--) PS+>++ PE(-) Y+ PGP(-)
t+ 5+ X+++(++++) R* tv++ b+(++) DI++ D-(--) G- e h--(*) r++ y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200409020620.i826KSHH019641>