Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 13:32:45 -0500 (EST) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu> To: Daniel Eischen <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/stdio Makefile.inc unlocked.c Message-ID: <200301101832.h0AIWjBS026224@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10301101010290.17888-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com> References: <200301100435.h0A4Z9f8029244@repoman.freebsd.org> <Pine.GSO.4.10.10301101010290.17888-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 10:15:05 -0500 (EST), Daniel Eischen <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com> said: > For functions that aren't defined by POSIX or other specs, we should > use "__" versions of those functions with the non-"__" versions being > weak definitions to them. Not necessarily. That is only true if: (1) The calling function is either Standard or in the same source file as a Standard function, and (2) the function called is not already in a namespace reserved by the Standard. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200301101832.h0AIWjBS026224>