Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 19:18:17 +0200 From: Tijl Coosemans <tijl@FreeBSD.org> To: Marko =?utf-8?Q?Cupa=C4=87?= <marko.cupac@mimar.rs> Cc: Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it>, mm@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Latest c-icap update Message-ID: <20140704191817.303cf68a@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <20140704144057.c0c29ba0a9b10968ddcfaaaa@mimar.rs> References: <53B68E11.10905@netfence.it> <20140704144057.c0c29ba0a9b10968ddcfaaaa@mimar.rs>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 4 Jul 2014 14:40:57 +0200 Marko Cupa=C4=87 wrote: > On Fri, 04 Jul 2014 13:20:49 +0200 > Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it> wrote: >> I see lots of bug reports on the net wrt to c-icap on FreeBSD and >> signal 11; however I believe they are all referring to old, now >> solved, problems. Is it so? >=20 > Those are probably mostly mine. I can't get squidclamav get to work on > 10.0 without exiting on signals 10 and 11. I had a correspondence in > March directly with Gilles Darold, author of squidclamav. He was > helpful, sending me experimental code for testing, but finally > instructed me to "use a Linux distribution instead I think you will be > more sure to have a working solution", until he figures things out. >=20 > Since then, I am monitoring ports for new versions of c-icap and > squidclamav, update every time new port is out, enable squidclamav in > squid configuration only to see it crashing after a few minutes, then > disabling it back. >=20 > My PR opened here: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D190336 If you build c-icap with the POSIXSEM option enabled does that make any difference? Anything interesting in the server log? What if you set DebugLevel to 10 in the config file?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140704191817.303cf68a>