Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 11:59:45 -0700 From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@tristatelogic.com> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Eliminating IPv6 (?) Message-ID: <23511.1560884385@segfault.tristatelogic.com> In-Reply-To: <23816.53518.998090.665606@jerusalem.litteratus.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <23816.53518.998090.665606@jerusalem.litteratus.org>, Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com> wrote: >> Actually, no, that's not how one is supposed to enable one's own set >> of ipfw ules. To do that, the Handbook (Sec. 30.4.1) says very clearly >> that one should do: >> >> firewall_enable="YES" >> firewall_type="path-to-my-rules-file" >> >> But I'm glad you brought it up. The funny thing is that even that >> doesn't work properly nowadays *or* like it used to in the past. > > If this is true - haven't checked personally - then it's a bug. >(And a non-trivial one, the fact you're the first to report it >notwithstanding.) > Can you please open a bug report? I aim to please. As requested: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238694 Regards, rfg
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?23511.1560884385>