Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 01:40:16 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> To: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@iafrica.com> Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: lsock(1) Message-ID: <3714C4F0.579FDDEE@newsguy.com> References: <15879.924101022@axl.noc.iafrica.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sheldon Hearn wrote: > > I didn't look at the code, but the functionality described in the > manpage looks cool and froody. I did. The code is smaller than the man page, actually. :-) It's just a matter of calling netstat and fstat, and correlating the results. > I take it that this signifies closure on the "Won't lsof ever be > imported?" issue. ;-) General consensus seems to be that lsof would rot if imported, making a port a much better option. If you doubt it, look at more(1). :-) -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org "nothing better than the ability to perform cunning linguistics" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3714C4F0.579FDDEE>