Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 23 Mar 2008 16:54:12 +0000 (UTC)
From:      "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bz@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Qing Li <qingli@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: PERFORCE change 138344 for review
Message-ID:  <20080323165342.C50685@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net>
In-Reply-To: <200803230811.m2N8BjAx005984@repoman.freebsd.org>
References:  <200803230811.m2N8BjAx005984@repoman.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 23 Mar 2008, Qing Li wrote:

> http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=138344
>
> Change 138344 by qingli@FreeBSD-newarp on 2008/03/23 08:11:05
>
>
> 	This patch provides the backend of the equal-cost multi-path
> 	support for both IPv4 and IPv6. Previously, multi-path route
> 	insertion is disallowed. For example,
>
> 		route add -net 192.103.54.0/24 10.9.44.1
> 		route add -net 192.103.54.0/24 10.9.44.10
>
> 	The second route insertion will trigger an error message of
> 	"add net 192.103.54.0/24: gateway 10.9.44.10: route already in table"
>
> 	More testing is in progress. I intend to provide incremental support
> 	for failover and connection load balancing across the multi-path.

If I am not misreading rtalloc_mpath is used nowhere. Are you sure
everything was submitted?

-- 
Bjoern A. Zeeb                                 bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
Software is harder than hardware  so better get it right the first time.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080323165342.C50685>