Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 14:17:22 +0100 From: Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> To: Stefan Parvu <sparvu@kronometrix.org> Cc: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" <arm@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: RPi4 Status and sysutils/rpi-firmware Message-ID: <20210303141722.c039bef0c50c6068779cedfe@bidouilliste.com> In-Reply-To: <FF4A6409-550B-44D0-ACB0-513A45F99081@kronometrix.org> References: <20210302122057.86ba62bb1daa7f922134ecd9@bidouilliste.com> <DA31F9D6-D1A0-42EF-94D9-D5CC194568B4@kronometrix.org> <20210303114724.81797c63767d6b09f5f70f59@bidouilliste.com> <FF4A6409-550B-44D0-ACB0-513A45F99081@kronometrix.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 13:29:52 +0200 Stefan Parvu <sparvu@kronometrix.org> wrote: > > > > Review what ? > > This: https://www.freebsd.org/platforms/ <https://www.freebsd.org/platforms/>; > > ARM is tier 2 platform. But this thread doesn't have anything to do with tier platforms. > > > There is a lot of other arm64 platforms. > > None are Tier 1. Or at least this is what Im seeing. Correct me if Im wrong. At least in Kronometrix, we will need a stable Tier 1 platform to continue building our IoT gateway on FreeBSD. arm64 (as an arch) will be tier-1 for 13.0 if I understood correctly. But that doesn't mean that RPI or any Allwinner or Rockchip boards will be defacto tier-1. Each board, or more exactly each SoC/SoC family, still needs to be maintain and correctly supported. > > Stefan -- Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> <manu@freebsd.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20210303141722.c039bef0c50c6068779cedfe>