Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 09 Jan 2007 20:52:22 +0900 (JST)
From:      NAKATA Maho <chat95@mac.com>
To:        jmz@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        ports@freebsd.org, stas@FreeBSD.org, kris@obsecurity.org, portmgr@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Migration to gfortran42
Message-ID:  <20070109.205222.74696332.chat95@mac.com>
In-Reply-To: <20070109091007.2C1DB56FA@nyx.dalai-zebu.org>
References:  <20070107.133544.78739935.chat95@mac.com> <20070109.175640.102530289.chat95@mac.com> <20070109091007.2C1DB56FA@nyx.dalai-zebu.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: Jean-Marc Zucconi <jmz@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: Migration to gfortran42
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 10:10:07 +0100 (CET)

> >>>>> NAKATA Maho writes:
> 
>  > Dear maintainers using Fortran and portmgr,
>  > First, portmgr@
>  > for migration purpose only I'd like to add 
>  >> WANT_FORTRAN=yes
>  >> USE_GCC=4.2+
>  > to each port that requires fortran. is it okay? if build is broken
>  > with this fortran, I'll fix, the I'll commit. Could you please approve
>  > my commits?
> 
> I would like to have the option of NOT using gcc 4.2. I am happy with
> the stock compiler in 6.x and don't use other FORTRAN ports requiring
> f90. 

Understand.

> At a minimum the libraries version must be changed so that older
> applications still work if by mistake we reinstall the libraries. I
> have a lot of programs compiled with lapack I don't want to rebuild.

Okay, I'll change the version of shared lib number. Then, is it okay for you?
and bump port revision. If you approve I'll go ahead...

-- NAKATA, Maho (maho@FreeBSD.org)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070109.205222.74696332.chat95>