Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 29 Sep 2000 14:38:04 -0500 (CDT)
From:      James Wyatt <jwyatt@rwsystems.net>
To:        sthaug@nethelp.no
Cc:        jim@siteplus.net, jan@smartsoft.cc, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: DNS: having domain1.com and domain1.net point to the same IP.
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.10.10009291426290.43354-100000@bsdie.rwsystems.net>
In-Reply-To: <31877.970245833@verdi.nethelp.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Wow, reverse lookups only match some of the time?!?! I may be off-base
again, but I thought a lot of things wanted reverse host entries that
matched exactly for security verification. I read your last comment, but
want to know what folks think would really happen. - Jy@

On Fri, 29 Sep 2000 sthaug@nethelp.no wrote:
> > Reverse lookups are like Highlanders.  "There can be only one."
> 
> No. You can certainly have a reverse lookup returning multiple names.
> Ie. the following is perfectly legal:
> 
> $origin 3.2.1.in-addr.arpa.
> 4	PTR	name1.example.com.
> 4	PTR	name2.example.com.
> 4	PTR	name3.example.com.
> 
> However, this does *not* necessarily mean that such a configuration
> is good idea...
> 
> Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.10009291426290.43354-100000>