Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 14:54:05 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: saving a few ports from death Message-ID: <4DB73EFD.1070502@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <19895.13977.553973.609431@jerusalem.litteratus.org> References: <ip53jn$92d$1@dough.gmane.org> <4DB6165F.1010806@FreeBSD.org> <20110426024122.GA38579@comcast.net> <A9C17565-97D8-43F1-9CF7-8CFC79EFEA7B@FreeBSD.org> <20110426163424.GB38579@comcast.net> <20110426141209.0d07bccf@seibercom.net> <20110426184315.GA2320@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> <19895.13977.553973.609431@jerusalem.litteratus.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 04/26/2011 14:18, Robert Huff wrote: > It is also possible it is only important to a fairly small > number ... but to those it is absolutely crucial. Fair enough, then one of them needs to step forward to maintain the port. :) FWIW, I think that the person who suggested deleting the port as a way to gain a metric of its popularity was joking ... Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4DB73EFD.1070502>