Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 16:28:11 +0200 From: David Demelier <demelier.david@gmail.com> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> Cc: scratch65535@att.net, freebsd-ports <ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version Message-ID: <CAO%2BPfDfmJ9dLwHFKENFSZ7ws5=Va%2B5vL3kTASufVMY87VqQM_w@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20170622141644.yadxdubynuhzygcy@ivaldir.net> References: <CAO%2BPfDeFz1JeSwU3f21Waz3nT2LTSDAvD%2B8MSPRCzgM_0pKGnA@mail.gmail.com> <20170622121856.haikphjpvr6ofxn3@ivaldir.net> <dahnkctsm1elbaqlarl8b9euouaplqk2tv@4ax.com> <20170622141644.yadxdubynuhzygcy@ivaldir.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2017-06-22 16:16 GMT+02:00 Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>: > The model with one branch per release will bring it to way more with a > maintenance window way larger (actually it is 3 month making the quarterly > relatively easy to maintain) So after three months if you don't switch branch, you're outdated since bugfixes are not applied in old ones. Then we get back into the same trouble of major upgrades while the user just wanted to have security updates. -- Demelier David
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAO%2BPfDfmJ9dLwHFKENFSZ7ws5=Va%2B5vL3kTASufVMY87VqQM_w>