Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:44:15 +0200 From: Sameh Ghane <sw@anthologeek.net> To: Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org> Cc: Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com>, Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>, Chris Dillon <cdillon@wolves.k12.mo.us>, "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru>, Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, brian@freebsd-services.com Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc/defaults rc.conf src/etc/mtree BSD.var.dist src/etc/namedb named.conf Message-ID: <20010824104415.A62762@anthologeek.net> In-Reply-To: <200108231756.f7NHu3g82765@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org>; from brian@Awfulhak.org on Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 06:56:03PM %2B0100 References: <dillon@earth.backplane.com> <200108231756.f7NHu3g82765@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le (On) Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 06:56:03PM +0100, Brian Somers ecrivit (wrote): > > As long as people follow the instructions when setting up secondariese, > > the sandbox will 'just work'. I think this is doable and reasonable, > > and I also think that since -stable is going to be with us for a long time > > we should seriously consider MFCing these changes. > > I'd have to object to any such MFC. It'll break peoples name servers > and that's unacceptable in -stable. People are told to put at least *2* nameservers in their /etc/resolv.conf. If they just have 127.0.0.1, this means they don't care a lot about resolving, as named can crash at any time. Also, I think it might be a good idea for 'ndc' to be able to parse /etc/defaults/rc.conf & /etc/rc.conf, for named_flags, and launch named with this flags. If you run bind with the default configuration, it will be running as bind:bind, but if you ndc restart it, it will run as root:wheel... -- Sameh To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010824104415.A62762>