Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 19:03:41 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>, drosih@rpi.edu, ade@FreeBSD.org, portmgr@FreeBSD.org, arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Switch to newer AUTOCONF, and fixing ports Message-ID: <20011025190341.D4609@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <3BD7C487.E994955B@FreeBSD.org>; from sobomax@FreeBSD.org on Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 10:51:35AM %2B0300 References: <200110242107.OAA09339@windsor.research.att.com> <20011024205654.E3080@FreeBSD.org> <p05101010b7fd2df7277b@[128.113.24.47]> <200110250527.WAA14597@windsor.research.att.com> <3BD7C487.E994955B@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 10:51:35AM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Very representative statistics, thank you Bill. That's why I > think that additional automakeXX/autoconfYY representing > newest versions is only the one way to go. WRONG!! Adding automakeXX/autoconfYY representing _OLD_ versions. The naked program name should be the latest released we have in ports. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011025190341.D4609>