Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 22:05:01 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bz@FreeBSD.org> To: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar> Cc: FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org>, Ivo Vachkov <ivo.vachkov@gmail.com>, Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Proposed patch for Port Randomization modifications according to RFC6056 Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1102272159350.6104@ai.fobar.qr> In-Reply-To: <4D6ABBB7.9060807@gont.com.ar> References: <AANLkTi=rF%2BCYiNG7PurPtrwn-AMT9cYEe90epGAJDwDq@mail.gmail.com> <4D411CC6.1090202@gont.com.ar> <AANLkTinvg5tft8xockuuV9g5QYd36ko9qO4YCvy5bkJ1@mail.gmail.com> <4D431258.8040704@FreeBSD.org> <AANLkTimhZ_pxTGt958AX8m=%2BS=g2hqsst=GH1a99D0g1@mail.gmail.com> <4D437B13.1070405@FreeBSD.org> <AANLkTim4=xa0rfoLgt-ao30XoZkLZ1hMYzE6LsrLNcbM@mail.gmail.com> <4D518FB3.3040503@FreeBSD.org> <4D6AB2BD.50208@gont.com.ar> <4D6AB636.3030708@FreeBSD.org> <4D6ABBB7.9060807@gont.com.ar>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011, Fernando Gont wrote:
Hi,
> On 27/02/2011 05:38 p.m., Doug Barton wrote:
>
>>> Has this been commited to the tree, already? -- If so, what's the
>>> default algorithm?
>>
>> Bjoern was planning to do it, I'm going to do it if he doesn't get
>> around to it.
>>
>> As for default algorithm, is there any reason not to make it 4?
>
> Not at all. Algorithm 4 (double-hash) is the best option, IMO.
I am still planning to do it soon but there is another thing in the
queue touching the pcb code, which are way harder to merge on
conflicts than this, so I am waiting for that to happen first.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
Stop bit received. Insert coin for new address family.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1102272159350.6104>