Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 15 Jul 2007 10:37:49 +0400 (MSD)
From:      Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru>
To:        Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>
Cc:        cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/etc/mtree BSD.include.dist BSD.usr.dist src/include Makefile src/lib Makefile src/rescue/rescue Makefile src/sbin/atm Makefile src/share/examples Makefile src/sys/conf NOTES files options src/sys/modules Makefile ...
Message-ID:  <20070715103646.I37333@woozle.rinet.ru>
In-Reply-To: <200707142149.l6ELnOfm059277@repoman.freebsd.org>
References:  <200707142149.l6ELnOfm059277@repoman.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007, Robert Watson wrote:

RW> rwatson     2007-07-14 21:49:24 UTC
RW> 
RW>   FreeBSD src repository
RW> 
RW>   Modified files:
RW>     etc/mtree            BSD.include.dist BSD.usr.dist 
RW>     include              Makefile 
RW>     lib                  Makefile 
RW>     rescue/rescue        Makefile 
RW>     sbin/atm             Makefile 
RW>     share/examples       Makefile 
RW>     sys/conf             NOTES files options 
RW>     sys/modules          Makefile 
RW>     sys/modules/netgraph/atm Makefile 
RW>     sys/netatm           atm_proto.c 
RW>     usr.bin/kdump        mkioctls 
RW>     usr.sbin             Makefile 
RW>   Log:
RW>   Disconnect netatm from the build as it is not MPSAFE and relies on
RW>   NET_NEEDS_GIANT, which will shortly be removed.  This is done in a
RW>   away that it may be easily reattached to the build before 7.1 if
RW>   appropriate locking is added.  Specifics:
RW>   
RW>   - Don't install netatm include files
RW>   - Disconnect netatm command line management tools
RW>   - Don't build libatm
RW>   - Don't include ATM parts in rescue or sysinstall
RW>   - Don't install sample configuration files and documents
RW>   - Don't build kernel support as a module or in NOTES
RW>   - Don't build netgraph wrapper nodes for netatm
RW>   
RW>   This removes the last remaining consumer of NET_NEEDS_GIANT.

Hmm, shouldn't these installation removals be also reflected in ObsoleteFiles?


Sincerely,
D.Marck                                     [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru ***
------------------------------------------------------------------------



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070715103646.I37333>