Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 12:23:28 +0100 From: Chris Howells <howells@kde.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD and poor ata performance Message-ID: <200410151223.33355.howells@kde.org> In-Reply-To: <416F90E6.10108@ng.fadesa.es> References: <416EB6B1.6060405@ng.fadesa.es> <416F849F.8020508@solid-state-logic.com> <416F90E6.10108@ng.fadesa.es>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart73190050.ysm7q1Hk3X Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 15 October 2004 09:57, fandino wrote: > I'm out of ideas, It doesn't matter if I use other PC or hard disks, > performance > sucks compared to Linux :-( OK, so you came to conclusion that "performance sucks" based on the the=20 theoretical throughput figures using dd and /dev/zero? Why don't you try measuring real world performace, with real files, not=20 somethig which is more than likely completely meaningless when two operatin= g=20 systems cache file system operations in different ways. =2D-=20 Cheers, Chris Howells -- chris@chrishowells.co.uk, howells@kde.org Web: http://chrishowells.co.uk, PGP ID: 0x33795A2C KDE/Qt/C++/PHP Developer: http://www.kde.org --nextPart73190050.ysm7q1Hk3X Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBb7M1F8Iu1zN5WiwRArjcAJ9Ey2hSNeIYjQX92O6FKHfiwMDJ5wCcDO1L z0xgVWItfht/iAvtjtRbGRk= =QGzs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart73190050.ysm7q1Hk3X--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200410151223.33355.howells>