Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 18:25:45 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org, hackers@FreeBSD.org, "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net> Subject: Re: [CFR] Remove texinfo from base Message-ID: <20140625162545.GE23976@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <E6402E7B-7490-406A-B973-4642D590F040@bsdimp.com> References: <20140625103107.GB23976@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140625104540.GE86779@over-yonder.net> <20140625105209.GC23976@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140625110049.GF86779@over-yonder.net> <40EA1066-4776-4B2E-988A-9900BB842862@bsdimp.com> <20140625154758.GD23976@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <E6402E7B-7490-406A-B973-4642D590F040@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Y46ssxGX9/CNNfN6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 09:09:30AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: >=20 > On Jun 25, 2014, at 8:47 AM, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >=20 > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 08:20:41AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > >>=20 > >> On Jun 25, 2014, at 4:00 AM, Matthew D. Fuller <fullermd@over-yonder.n= et> wrote: > >>=20 > >>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:52:10PM +0200 I heard the voice of > >>> Baptiste Daroussin, and lo! it spake thus: > >>>>=20 > >>>> I have just committed the support for this in ports, anyway breakage > >>>> should be reported, right now it seems fine on my exp-run > >>>=20 > >>> Oh, yes. Sorry, I did phrase that poorly. This shouldn't _break_ > >>> anything, but I suspect it will uncover existing-but-hidden breakage. > >>>=20 > >>> Which is good. But does merit awareness that "hey, this will probably > >>> happen somewhere, so know this is a place to look when a build > >>> breaks". > >>=20 > >> I know it will break certain nanobsd configurations that build ports b= ecause > >> dependencies there (at least for the ones I=E2=80=99ve done) aren=E2= =80=99t well handled. So > >> I agree that this patch is missing, at the very least, an UPDATING ent= ry and > >> a __FreeBSD_version bump. > >=20 > > If you build a port that needs texinfo the port framework will do what = it needs >=20 > Except in environments that don=E2=80=99t do dependencies quite right, or= where only a subset > of ports tree has been imported and texinfo isn=E2=80=99t part of that=E2= =80=A6 But people with them > usually know, which is why UPDATING is needed. That=E2=80=99s all. There= =E2=80=99s nothing else for you > to do. Yes sure UPDATING was anyway intended I'm not sure about the __FreeBSD_vers= ion. regards, Bapt --Y46ssxGX9/CNNfN6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlOq+AkACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Exx0gCfc9mwkKffv/zbBG+yPP8gy/Sd eG4An14wQFabTUU16j01sjo7u3eWNEV1 =tFgj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Y46ssxGX9/CNNfN6--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140625162545.GE23976>