Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 13:19:18 +0900 (JST) From: NAKATA Maho <chat95@mac.com> To: gerald@pfeifer.com Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, obrien@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/lang/gcc40 Makefile distinfo pkg-plist Message-ID: <20050527.131918.122625090.chat95@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.62.0505262128470.25754@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> References: <Pine.BSF.4.62.0505212152420.33827@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <20050523023831.GC62971@dragon.NUXI.org> <Pine.BSF.4.62.0505262128470.25754@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.62.0505262128470.25754@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> wrote: > On Sun, 22 May 2005, David O'Brien wrote: > >> However, I think we should see to use one of the regular ports in the > >> future instead of having a special port just for the purpose of building > >> OpenOffice.org. > > At the moment gcc-ooo has some needed patches that were rejected for GCC > > 3.4. So we have no choice - unless we add the patches to the gcc34 port. > > I investigated doing that, but I wasn't comfortable with the changes the > > patches make to add them to gcc34 for general use. > > Yes, in that case we shouldn't do that. However, I wonder whether it's > really necessary to keep gcc-ooo as a port of its own instead of making > it a child port of the main gcc34 port which carries additional patches? > > Alternatively, how about giving the gcc40 port a try? Hm, recently gcc40 has been supported by Caolan, but I'm sure after next few milestones we must raise some gcc40 issues. BTW: I had been porting OOo to Mac OS X, and I used Xcode 1.5, gcc-3.3. gcc-3.3 has a bug in parser, and Hamburg team do not use gcc-3.3, so we raised many issues, and integration can take time (1-2 weeks). -- NAKATA, Maho (maho@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050527.131918.122625090.chat95>