Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 11:54:12 +0200 From: Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de> To: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: k3b 2.0 Message-ID: <4C4FFE44.9040506@bsdforen.de> In-Reply-To: <201007280924.o6S9NwJe065185@fire.js.berklix.net> References: <201007280924.o6S9NwJe065185@fire.js.berklix.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 28/07/2010 11:23, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Dominic Fandrey wrote: >> Just out of curiosity, is anyone working on porting k3b 2.0? >> I'd like to get rid of the KDE3 legacy. Especially, because >> kdelibs3 is such a pain to build (fails if openssl-1.0 is present). > > I've seen kdelibs fail on 2 x amd64 8.1-RC2, breaking build of > graphics/digikam sysutils/k3b x11/kde3 editors/koffice-kde3 > > openssl would be hard to avoid as: > pkg_info -R /var/db/pkg/openssl-1.0.0_2 > ... I do it the ugly way: # pkg_create -b openssl-1.0.0_2 # pkg_delete -f openssl-1.0.0_2 rebuild kdelibs3 # pkg_add openssl-1.0.0_2.tbz Regards -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C4FFE44.9040506>