Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 09:36:43 -0500 From: Mark Bucciarelli <mark@gaiahost.coop> To: Free BSD Questions list <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: nullfs [was: Need urgent help regarding security] Message-ID: <20051117143643.GC2572@rabbit> In-Reply-To: <D4EE1810-A918-491C-9860-CF12945337A7@shire.net> References: <51190.68.165.89.71.1132194943.squirrel@mail.el.net> <20051117025112.3707143D45@mx1.FreeBSD.org> <20051117043859.GF26954@localdomain> <D4EE1810-A918-491C-9860-CF12945337A7@shire.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 10:16:16PM -0700, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote: > I then create one or more jails that use nullfs to READ ONLY mount > specific parts of the master hierarchy into the jail. This is very interesting to me, as I are currently working on a jail design and nullfs has a number of question marks next to it, mainly due to the scary man page warning. Here are a few of the questions: How did you decide it was trustworthy? Does it result in lower RAM usage? (The program that is run, for example, Apache, comes from the same spot on the disk across all jails.) Is it currently maintained? The man page includes a maintainer solicitation. Have you had any problems in production? Have you used it for long? m
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051117143643.GC2572>