Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 13 Apr 2017 22:44:05 +0100
From:      Matthew Seaman <matthew@FreeBSD.org>
To:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Ports not building due to release not supported
Message-ID:  <9186a4e6-05e2-e3ff-abe8-bfb463354225@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <2F.ED.19079.D74EFE85@xtra.co.nz>
References:  <2F.ED.19079.D74EFE85@xtra.co.nz>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--OQ0IL37ixAtef11aE7H0dqXiSBCl4WCt5
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="vBuD2hsTabVOwkOoNnL1bMvsX394CqpOB";
 protected-headers="v1"
From: Matthew Seaman <matthew@FreeBSD.org>
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <9186a4e6-05e2-e3ff-abe8-bfb463354225@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: Ports not building due to release not supported
References: <2F.ED.19079.D74EFE85@xtra.co.nz>
In-Reply-To: <2F.ED.19079.D74EFE85@xtra.co.nz>

--vBuD2hsTabVOwkOoNnL1bMvsX394CqpOB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 13/04/2017 21:50, mmumby@xtra.co.nz wrote:
> I am unable to build ports as I am getting the error message =E2=80=93
> Ports Collection support for your FreeBSD version has ended, and no por=
ts are
> guaranteed to build on this system. Please upgrade to a supported relea=
se.
>=20
> But my version is=20
> FreeBSD rpi2 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #0 r293851: Fri Jan 22 2=
2:09:32 NZDT 2016     mark@raspberryPI:/usr/home/mark/crochet-master/work=
/obj/arm.armv6/usr/src/sys/RPI2  arm

Yes, 11.0-CURRENT is no longer supported.  11.0-RELEASE is what is now
supported.

Your freebsd-update command is failing because the freebsd update
servers don't understand '11.0-CURRENT' as a known release -- this was a
development version before 11.0-RELEASE came out.  Your best choices are
either to grab some install media from the FTP sites and install a new
11.0-RELEASE system, or to use svn or similar to grab up-to-date sources
and build yourself a newer system.  Almost certainly the former given
you have a rpi2.

	Cheers,

	Matthew


--vBuD2hsTabVOwkOoNnL1bMvsX394CqpOB--

--OQ0IL37ixAtef11aE7H0dqXiSBCl4WCt5
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=/A9e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--OQ0IL37ixAtef11aE7H0dqXiSBCl4WCt5--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9186a4e6-05e2-e3ff-abe8-bfb463354225>