Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 20:12:50 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> To: Joel Dahl <joel@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org, Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net>, doc-committers@freebsd.org, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>, cvs-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/contributors contrib.committers.sgml contrib.develalumni.sgml Message-ID: <20060210181249.GA949@flame.pc> In-Reply-To: <1139594811.954.14.camel@dude.automatvapen.se> References: <200602091800.k19I0gHR024988@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060210171224.GI21499@submonkey.net> <1139592139.790.7.camel@dude.automatvapen.se> <200602101235.54875.jhb@freebsd.org> <1139594811.954.14.camel@dude.automatvapen.se>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2006-02-10 19:06, Joel Dahl <joel@freebsd.org> wrote: >> You can use common sense though. He was obviously a ports committer. > > Guys, I'm lost. What are we arguing about? > > He was a ports committer, but I fail to see how that is important since > the Development Team Alumni doesn't differentiate between different > types of commit bits? > > Maybe I was a bit unclear with the meaning of the "unclassified commit > bit" comment; it's just a reminder, since they're still in our access > files. :-) No arguing from me. I mentioned he was the ports-meister, just in case the `unclassified' comment was meant to be a reminder of ``we don't know what this guy was working on''. It's obvious that the comment is not, since it only mentions names listed in access.unclassified, so there's nothing to argue about.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060210181249.GA949>