Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2017 00:26:40 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r316487 - head/etc Message-ID: <861st64hjz.fsf@desk.des.no> In-Reply-To: <201704050305.v3535VE2006000@slippy.cwsent.com> (Cy Schubert's message of "Tue, 04 Apr 2017 20:05:31 -0700") References: <201704050305.v3535VE2006000@slippy.cwsent.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com> writes: > This patch caused some boot failures because the contents of rc_force wer= e=20 > redefined from "yes" (for yes) and NULL (for no) to the words "yes" and=20 > "no". This in turn caused etc/rc.d/dhclient to assume force when $rc_forc= e=20 > was not NULL (test -z failed). Interfaces with static IP addresses invoke= d=20 > rc.d/dhclient through devd. The attached patch should make all instances= =20 > $rc_force consistent with your change. Yes, I just realized. I committed the wrong version of the patch. I had a version in a different tree which added check_force etc. functions. Could you please revert? I'd like to spend a little more time making sure I get everything right. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?861st64hjz.fsf>