Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 6 Jul 2000 17:57:26 -0500
From:      Glenn Johnson <gjohnson@nola.srrc.usda.gov>
To:        "Richard E. Hawkins" <hawk@fac13.ds.psu.edu>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: convincing (n)mh to use vim rather than vi
Message-ID:  <20000706175726.A60909@node1.cluster.srrc.usda.gov>
In-Reply-To: <200007061840.OAA82733@fac13.ds.psu.edu>; from hawk@fac13.ds.psu.edu on Thu, Jul 06, 2000 at 02:40:25PM -0400
References:  <200007061840.OAA82733@fac13.ds.psu.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jul 06, 2000 at 02:40:25PM -0400, Richard E. Hawkins wrote:

> OK, I'm stumped.  I've tried setting both $EDITOR and $VISUAL, as well
> as first reading, then madly grepping my way through the man for nmh.
>
> Nothing I do convinces it to use /usr/local/bin/vim rather than
> /usr/bin/vi.
>
> I've even tried aliasing vi to /usr/local/bin/vim, all to no avail.
>
> The answer must be obvious, so could someone give me a hint before it
> turns into a snake and bites me? :)

It has been a while since I have used (n)mh but I believe you specify
the editor in your ~/.mh_profile.

-- 
Glenn Johnson
USDA, ARS, SRRC			 Phone: (504) 286-4252
New Orleans, LA 70124		e-mail: gjohnson@nola.srrc.usda.gov


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000706175726.A60909>