Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 13 Aug 1999 07:42:27 -0500 (CDT)
From:      dave <dave@comsite.net>
To:        Michael Richards <026809r@dragon.acadiau.ca>
Cc:        "Mikhail A. Sokolov" <mishania@demos.net>, Tom Brown <tomb@securify.com>, "'freebsd-security@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: "Secure-FreeBSD" Idea
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.02A.9908130740210.11942-100000@bsdserve1.comsite.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9908130119520.25855-100000@dragon>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Fri, 13 Aug 1999, Michael Richards wrote:
> 
> I was toying with this idea too. People often say when comparing FreeBSD
> and linux that "FreeBSD is harder to install." Although I don't agree with
> that statement, I had to take note on how easy my install of BeOS went.
> Basically I popped the CD in, selected the partition and hit install. It
> whirled rebooted and presto, I was running Be.

I recently installed Redhat and FreeBSD...I am familiar with both, but the
Redhat install took 3 runs through the install process to get right, and
FreeBSD took only one...Granted, they were minor problems in redhat that
most people wouldn't come across, but it is still one valid experience of
mine...(The FreeBSD install was more flexible than the redhat one).

--dave



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.02A.9908130740210.11942-100000>