Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 17:02:32 +0100 From: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> To: Yuri <yuri@freebsd.org>, "ports@freebsd.org" <ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Can PORTVERSION be gYYYYMMDD ? Message-ID: <35000647-6496-04cb-87ff-229d8a6d09d4@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <e71788d7-25bc-17d0-160e-ccec2bc1ff8c@freebsd.org> References: <e71788d7-25bc-17d0-160e-ccec2bc1ff8c@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --PC1SWnnMwvGPikkfDB3ODFssEgP82XJEv Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="xvQaVPq8tUbj7O8hItXJO6BBsJNi5JGtK"; protected-headers="v1" From: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> To: Yuri <yuri@freebsd.org>, "ports@freebsd.org" <ports@freebsd.org> Message-ID: <35000647-6496-04cb-87ff-229d8a6d09d4@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Can PORTVERSION be gYYYYMMDD ? References: <e71788d7-25bc-17d0-160e-ccec2bc1ff8c@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <e71788d7-25bc-17d0-160e-ccec2bc1ff8c@freebsd.org> --xvQaVPq8tUbj7O8hItXJO6BBsJNi5JGtK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Language: fr Le 28/11/2017 =C3=A0 09:36, Yuri a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0: > The port audio/ir-lv2 was committed with PORTVERSION=3Dg20130909. > > make in another port with this instruction: > > > RUN_DEPENDS=3Dir-lv2>0:audio/ir-lv2 > doesn't check the version of ir properly, and always tries to rebuild i= t. > > > Is PORTVERSION=3DgYYYYMMDD actually allowed? > > The handbook doesn't mention such format. Section Example=C2=A05.9 here= > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/make= file-distfiles.html#makefile-distname-ex1 > offers PORTVERSION=3D20160710 as an example. > > If it's not allowed, why doesn't framework complain? > > Otherwise, the version check for such ports must be fixed.=20 There is an example a bit further down on that page with the gYYYYMMDD. The idea is that in each label (things between dots) in version numbers, letters are before the numbers. $ pkg version -t 1.0.a1 1.0 < The idea behind using gYYYYMMDD for snapshot of software that never had versions is so that if they ever get a version, gYYYYMMDD is still before version 0, so using PORTEPOCH is not needed. --=20 Mathieu Arnold --xvQaVPq8tUbj7O8hItXJO6BBsJNi5JGtK-- --PC1SWnnMwvGPikkfDB3ODFssEgP82XJEv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJaHYi2XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQzQUI2OTc4OUQyRUQxMjEwNjQ0MEJBNUIz QTQ1MTZGMzUxODNDRTQ4AAoJEDpFFvNRg85IIIcQAKDWuHxM80SeFR1hKh2/ruZM M+hgA582h47FZJ0o7Q9b5COcODhokNhU4jjPH89J+Ud7Nm5QhvX50HAJkSvvlJNo 8vwR955BIh5FXYX9M4TgDXjpFNSrRUwLnw4sQTHkcolYRFGwKJhBI6NYK0kLxRNS KL6N+TfeWBkHG4gFRbk7FfWb3x0uYmQj+ZrlBYebkRkKn1dUGyovD8KkklCHt20E 4RREUy9kCbaaD3GUN2IAaS2zyvuV4Q+sCb93HcluWL16QAi/sHPKyX5xI9zGBgCi YyR+z+VaQ9FRtViwu40tmugcCF50WbkWgBEcb+7NO2Akuxz+WEpygQKX9cPeyLZA og18t6GKE5+B3nfvyk/Onq6SBjJhiJvgZGBLAQu4noRe5aezwKYjhxAnc+wNLIe8 gIVeu3gXq4wYRIM5hsqdm6C1DXFvXEqQi4quayLMnOQg8kHejmdiDXdYDH6Jl+Ek iA3N/l0e/lxIlfPI2temCnWEyiCuKKUDRk4GZ0DwCKo5h297KMc3dA3QVn21dC+T EaBqdb1qncVu+UgY49deiH/1Jntv/dphmL61+H8Ul0y5RG1jCAJj/WT6MjYlG/2H uUVgnw1idqt0KPh1d9ttevR+7hVVr6ISRrGcK4fJXyccMFQdsodRomYMKgd6M3TM 5bvZAE6O8M8ssLzsxcDA =EqWT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --PC1SWnnMwvGPikkfDB3ODFssEgP82XJEv--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?35000647-6496-04cb-87ff-229d8a6d09d4>