Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 14:16:26 +0000 From: Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org> To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Cc: "freebsd-fs@freebsd.org" <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>, Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Default inode number too low in FFS nowadays? Message-ID: <20111104141626.GA28925@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4EB3C63F.2060805@quip.cz> References: <B888842A-7DB4-491B-93E3-A376745019F5@sarenet.es> <j8u2af$chv$1@dough.gmane.org> <5C156A63-D86D-4C1B-AFC4-DC5EA09494F6@xerq.net> <4EB3C63F.2060805@quip.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri Nov 4 11, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> Matt Connor wrote:
> >
> >On Nov 3, 2011, at 5:43 AM, Ivan Voras<ivoras@freebsd.org> wrote:
> >
> >>On 02/11/2011 12:57, Borja Marcos wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >>Did you forget to do "make clean" after "make install" on several large
> >>ports?
> >>
> >>But yes, the ports tree is getting a bit unwieldy. On the other hand,
> >>did you fsck the file system lately?
> >>
> >
> >cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portupgrade&& make install clean
> >
> >portsclean -CD
> >
> >That's a quick way to clean out all the clutter.
>
> Installing ruby and portupgrade is really big overhead to simple task,
> which can be done by:
>
> cd /usr/ports && make clean
>
> or with find:
>
> find /usr/ports/ -depth 3 -name "work" -exec rm -r {} +
...or with 'rm -rf /usr/ports/*/*/work'
cheers.
alex
>
> Miroslav Lachman
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111104141626.GA28925>