Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 2 Mar 1997 21:11:56 -0500 (EST)
From:      Brian Tao <taob@risc.org>
To:        Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au>
Cc:        "Bror 'Count' Heinola" <count@key.sms.fi>, hasty@rah.star-gate.com, jkh@time.cdrom.com, FREEBSD-CHAT-L <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: 2.2 Compiler slower than 2.1? (was RSA 56-bit key challenge)
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.95.970302211112.698F-100000@alpha.risc.org>
In-Reply-To: <199703030024.KAA23122@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 3 Mar 1997, Michael Smith wrote:
> 
> Someone should try reducing the rate of timer/clock interrupts;
> Amancio only needs about another 2% to get past 400K 8)

    Would "rtprio 0 -<pid>" help?  I'd use that more, if it didn't
lock up my machine while the process was running.  :(
--
Brian Tao (BT300, taob@risc.org)
"Though this be madness, yet there is method in't"




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.970302211112.698F-100000>