Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 09:00:14 +0400 (MSD) From: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@FreeBSD.org> To: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.org> Cc: doc-committers@FreeBSD.org, Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/share/sgml man-refs.ent Message-ID: <20050527085928.N83542@mp2.macomnet.net> In-Reply-To: <1117119626.34783.8.camel@tomcat.kitchenlab.org> References: <200505261435.j4QEZT1I087747@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050526144234.GA918@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> <1117119626.34783.8.camel@tomcat.kitchenlab.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 26 May 2005, 08:00-0700, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > If memory serves me right, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > On 2005-05-26 14:35, "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > > > > > New manpage entities: devfs.conf(5), devfs.rules(5), pthread_atfork(3). > > > > > > Revision Changes Path > > > 1.342 +3 -0 doc/share/sgml/man-refs.ent > > > > Thank you! I should have added those when I added the manpages :-) > > You're welcome! Strictly speaking I don't think there is a requirement > for updating man-refs.ent when adding new manpages. It really only > becomes an issue when some other document (e.g. release notes) needs the > entities. I think those of us who work on such things are used to > taking care of it. :-) man-refs.ent is used by man.cgi, isn't? -- Maxim Konovalov
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050527085928.N83542>